Why We Get Cancer

Why We Get Cancer



Why We Get Cancer

Marianne Williamson shines a light on illness

(This article was originally posted on Whole Life Times)

In a lifetime rich with learning, few experiences have taught me as much as cancer. But I still have one burning question. What is the meaning of cancer? And whose answers can I believe? That’s the kind of conundrum you take to someone like Marianne Williamson.

After three trips though cancer, I’ve discovered I’m a member of an invisible army of survivors. Nearly 14.5 million of us with a history of cancer were alive in America in January 2014, according to the American Cancer Society. These days in America, two in three cancer patients live five years or longer—a success rate that would have been a pipe dream just a few years ago.

However, the blessing of life arrives with problems. It turns out that we cancer survivors are magnets for unsought advice from every would-be diagnostician, biochemist, crystal healer, kibitzer and conspiracy theorist we chance to meet. People mean well. But it’s wearing.

My pet peeve is folks who tell me I caused my own cancer by holding on to old resentments. In Los Angeles, where I live, this opinion is common. I trace it back to readings and misreadings of the writings of New Age thinkers such as Louise Hay (You Can Heal Your Life), Caroline Myss (Why People Don’t Heal and How They Can) and Rhonda Byrne (The Secret).

Ideas that sound lovely in the abstract (your thoughts create your reality, including “dis-ease”) can turn mean and hurtful in practice, especially when aimed at someone grappling with a life-threatening illness.

The adult children of a friend of mine forbade her to mention her Stage IV ovarian cancer in their presence. They told her she was “feeding” the cancer by acknowledging it.

A woman I met at a conference nodded sympathetically as I described the sadness of knowing that that a dear friend was near death from ovarian cancer, whereas, 15 years after diagnosis, here I stood.

“I wonder what in you wanted to live, and what in her didn’t?” the woman mused.

Statements like these are rude—but are they wrong? I wanted clarity, and Williamson agreed to help me talk it out.

Williamson is, of course, an avatar of New Age spirituality who has been lecturing since the early 1980s on the spiritual text, A Course in Miracles. Her 1992 best-seller, A Return to Love,was the first of a dozen popular books she’s penned. In 2014 she ran for Congress, taking on such issues as Citizens United, income inequality and the pollution of our food supply. In discussing cancer, we moved from spirituality to medicine to politics and back again.

I begin with a true story that always makes my point. A few years back, I met a woman at a chic dinner party in Santa Monica. Told I was undergoing cancer treatment, she smiled brightly and said, “Thank God I don’t store my anger! Would you pass the salmon?”

Williamson’s first response blasts through the phone.“WHAT?”

After a few observations that we agree are off the record, Williamson settles on this reaction: “It’s extraordinary the foolishness that passes for spiritual wisdom these days.”

My next question: If cancer is not a manifestation of my own inner anger, then what is it, and why do people run around quoting thinkers like Williamson to explain it?

“Anyone can be taken out of context, but what I have said is that thought is the creative consciousness for all experience,” she responds. “But that doesn’t mean that the person who contracts the illness is necessarily the one whose consciousness was wrong-minded. For example, a child gets a brain tumor that we know is related to a carcinogen that’s in the river near where that child lives. Did the diseased condition come from consciousness? Absolutely—the fact that we put short-term economic gain before the health and well-being of the living things on this planet.

“But the person who contracts the disease is often the person who reflects it back to society. Great souls have contracted cancer,” she reminds me. “The idea that there is some direct linear connection, always easy to detect, or even necessarily there, between the person who contracts an illness and their own thinking—the situation is much deeper and more complicated than that.

“Now, that is not to ignore the holistic paradigm—body, mind and spirit,” Williamson continues. “There is serious work to be done, whether the condition is illness or any other problem. Part of my medicine involves a change in my thinking. But that’s different from saying, I caused this.

“Often people think the work on consciousness is to go back and ask, ‘How did I create this?’ The issue in life is not just how or whether I created something, but how am I handling it right now? How do I work a miracle now?”

“So what should I say the next time someone tells me I caused my own cancer?” I ask.

She considers. “You put your hand over your heart—remember people speak to you on the level from which you’e speaking—and, without judgment, you say, “That comment was so unhelpful.”

I don’t doubt that miracles happen among cancer patients. I’m one of them. But I find it hard to believe anyone would bypass chemo and surgery for affirmations or crystals or mangosteen. Conversely, I catch shade from folks who wouldn’t get chemo if, well, their lives depended on it. What really heals us, and why do we snipe at each other about it?

I ask Williamson how holistic healing works. Do we really expect forgiveness or meditation to heal cancer? Again, the picture she paints is more nuanced and convincing than I expect.

“According to A Course in Miracles,” she begins, “the fact that we identify primarily with the body rather than with the spirit puts a stress on the body that the body was not meant to carry—and that’s where sickness comes from.

“It’s the mind [not the body] that has an infinite capacity to do what we aren’t even asking it to do,” Williamson continues. “That’s why meditation and forgiveness are such an important part of your medicine. Forgiveness is a willingness to extend our perception of an event, particularly of a person, beyond what the physical senses perceive to what the heart knows to be true. It is a shift into the quantum field beyond time and space. When I shift my consciousness into the quantum field, it gives my body the capacity to relax in that moment. And in that relaxation lies restorative power.”

I think of the heart-lung bypass machine used in surgery, allowing the organs to take a break while repairs go on. The analogy makes sense for me. And I appreciate that Williamson is not saying, “Meditation good; pills bad.”

“It’s called integrative care for a reason,” she goes on. “Sometimes people go to the doctor and the doctor gives them a medicine—none of which is a hundred percent guaranteed, by the way—and they take notes. They’re so careful. ‘Am I supposed to take it in the morning or the afternoon, do I take it with food or without food?’ Whereas with meditation, I’ll say, ‘Do you meditate?’ and people will say, ‘Sometimes I do, sometimes I don’t.’ Meditation is medicine, just like your other medicines. You should take it just as seriously.”

“Let me understand, though,” I say. “No one is guaranteeing that you’re going to have a physical cure, that your cancer is going to be totally gone one morning because you meditated, right?”

“One of the best ways to heal the body is to accept the reality of death,” Williamson counters. “We’re all leaving here. Some of us are taking the 10:05 and some of us will be on the 11:20, but we’re all leaving. And our over-attachment to the physical body, since the physical senses tell us that that’s all our life is, is part of that stress on the body.

“Your true self is deathless, and the more you identify with that rather than your body, then the more you’re programming not just your subconscious but every cell in your body to be the perfect container for your soul’s work this lifetime. Now, that might mean you live a short time or a long time. Part of the healing is the realization that that’s not what ultimately matters.”

Williamson pauses. “If we’re supposed to be here for another 10 or 20 years— if that would be the highest level that life takes for all living things—that’s what’s going to happen. Cancer’s not taking you.”

 After our goodbyes, Williamson’s words leave a sense of peace behind. I may never understand the meaning of cancer, but on balance I’m grateful for the adventure. Life and death on an infinite continuum, with a chance to expedite a miracle or two? I can live with that.

Anne Stockwell is founder and president of Well Again: Adventures in Life Beyond Cancer.


Let’s help get Marianne Williamson into the White House! We don’t have any more time to waste, changes need to be made, and she’s the best chance we have to create a better future for all. 

Connect with
the Campaign!

and stay up to date. 

The Memery Behind Election Campaigns

The Memery Behind Election Campaigns



The Memery Behind Election Campaigns

(originally published on socialstrategist.net – by Sarah Marilyn) You can’t manufacture a meme campaign – many brands and political hopefuls have tried. Andrew Yang is the only one to really achieve a modicum of success doing so. He paid for a handful of internet memers to generate some content for his campaign, and drum up some hype – with mixed results. He could be forgiven for such a rookie move because in the last two elections, memes were decidedly impactful. If your strategy is to come into the race strong, launching with some memes can seem smart, based on what we’ve seen in the past.

So, is it a Joke, or Not?

His manufactured meme movement did make a small splash, even though he was early to the Democratic primaries and attempted the paid-meme campaign coming right out of the gate – no warm-up. If you think that paying someone to make a meme is the same as making a real meme, you might miss the fact that memes actually require many layers of context. It’s not like an influencer marketing campaign or sponsored content. If no one has heard of you, there isn’t much context for a meme. Unless the forced not-having-heard of you becomes a meme, that is. It’s like making up a word that nobody has heard before, and expecting everyone to understand the meaning with no context. Most people will just ignore the information, and nobodyis going to go – ah-ha! Contrast this with the viral Marianne Williamson meme movement #OrbGang, which sprung up completely unconnected to her campaign, spontaneously after her first debate performance. There were moments during the debate that were notorious, and there were also years and years of Marianne Tweet backlogs to comb through to give the memes the requisite layers of context. Presently, the Twittersphere hosts both #YangGang and #OrbGang – and at this time Andrew Yang does have some authentic memers dedicated to his cause. Outsiders can try and parse the irony levels of each movement, but ultimately whether people support the “$1000/month basic income” or “harnessing love for political purposes” ironically or not is actually tertiary. Focusing on measuring the irony is both a lost cause and misses the point. Nobody asked whether the Pepe memes of the Trump campaign were serious or not. Like orbs and YangGang, people were inclined to write it off as a joke that kind of went over their heads. At that time we had little awareness of the power and importance of memes in elections. Now, we are more aware of the potential of a viral meme phenomenon, but still possess few clues about how to weigh and assess the layers of ironic context in meme movements. Joshua Citarella, an independent academic, is most lucid in summing up our 2016 hindsight on the matter: “the Pepe-style trolls of the Alt-right made it clear that irony had never been apolitical. Ironic propaganda functions the same as real propaganda. Ironic voting is just voting.”

The Story of Subversive Meme Operatives

The two biggest historical examples of political meme operative movements are the hacker collective Anonymous and the alt-right Pepe the frog movements. Both had similar beginnings, but the Pepe movement’s solid traction on social media as well as its successful result during the 2016 election allowed us to draw some important conclusions about how this phenomenon works. The first new conclusion was that it actually does work. #YangGang was the next notable attempt at replicating the results. Because they launched a paid-meme campaign with little context, it was an open invitation for eager meme-actors to fill in some context of their own. Yang’s paid-meme campaign quickly attracted some of the notorious alt-right and crypto-white supremacists on social media. These trolls are quite vigilant, after getting a taste of the limelight in 2016, in private forums about keeping track of trending meme movements to co-opt with their messaging. Yang (hopefully unwittingly) opened the door wide open for them to fill in their own context into his movement. The ideological operatives quickly appropriated segments of his message to disseminate among their groups and on new meme pages of their own, to deliberately attempt to co-opt the Yang campaign messaging. To be clear, few of these users actually believe they will co-opt an entire movement (although they did have a field day with the Trump campaign). They know that their views are fringe, and so are eager to disseminate their ideas subversively in publicly palatable formats like memes, which most people engage with without much intellectual rigor and syndicate widely. Their goal is simply push their views out into the light, so that they can step out of the shadows. Injecting some symbolism here and there, twisting quotes towards their “blood and soil” agenda…more than just propagandistic experimentation, it is actually game-ified by ‘like’ buttons, shares, and retweets – they can view their Facebook analytics and track which memes work the most subversively, and watch the engagements roll in. In an age where likes and shares are addicting, there is a built-in incentive for viral meme propagandizing or “trolling”. Like the bully who doesn’t mind being bad to other kids on the playground, so long as they get the attention they crave – it doesn’t really matter how high or low-quality a meme is, so long as it gets the engagements. Social media platforms are a playground for these people. Social media platforms right now are a playground for everyone, actually. Social media is popularly viewed as a non-adult thing, and it is not policed by anyone but the platforms themselves. Nobody is held accountable for their own actions on social media, so victims of cyber-bullying or harassment have two choices:
  1. report to a platform admin – who, unlike school playground admins, have no legal responsibility to treat the situation with due consideration.
  2. handle it themselves – doxx the person, find out where they work, and demand that their employer be the supervising adult and mediate this behavior – because they are the only responsive and locate-able authority that will do anything.
Some people will end up standing up to the cyberbullies, and some just log off and kill themselves. Whether its cyberbullies or political operatives, we apparently still don’t take social media seriously enough to change the status quo.

Corrective Action and Preparedness

Looking at the profiles of many troll meme accounts, they generally all follow the standard white supremacist and crusader pages, and have even dipped toes into a few of the presidential campaigns this election – all Democratic candidates – interestingly. There are subsets of these alt-right groups that are actually very upset with Trump, because they view his support of Israel as a betrayal for sending American resources to a Jewish country as aid. The most popular Democratic candidates among these trolls are Tulsi Gabbard, Andrew Yang, and now Marianne Williamson. The rise of alt-right trolls in these movements happens to coincide with growing Libertarian interest in the candidates. With #YangGang, they were able to be most successful – not only is Andrew Yang rising in the polls (albeit slowly), there is now even a Yangistan, an analog to the famous alt-right Pepe kekistan territory. The right wasted no time taking the meme bait, and by all appearances they are actually successfully replicating their activities of 2016, if Andrew Yang’s rise continues. It remains to be seen whether the Yang campaign will be able to prevent their memes from being associated in mainstream consciousness with the alt-right, given the apparent lack of meme culture foresight going in. High-profile political candidates of the future will have to be more prepared for this type of activity. The Trump campaign openly welcomed the Pepe memes, and assisted in syndicating the memes to a wider audience – much like Marianne is doing with the orbgang memes she finds. It’s a strong way to handle the memery behind elections, and in my opinion, the best way. Any meme movement that springs up around your brand should be harmonious and empower your brand – otherwise you will simply lose control over your brand. You cannot control the memes made about your brand any more than you can control what people say about your brand. But you can control the discourse. The Trump campaign had no bones about cozying up to the white supremacist ideologues in the meme-sphere, and it is doubtful that the Marianne campaign will attempt to drum up white supremacist support in the same way. It remains to be seen, as with the Yang campaign, what becomes of the memery behind their campaigns, and what steps will be taken. I would predict, actually, that the Marianne campaign will do as much to shut down any alt-right meme ideological machinery as the Bernie campaign did – provided they are aware and alert to it. It will be interesting to see whether one of them ends up accidentally sharing one of the crypto-white supremacist memes floating around their campaign, unaware of the subversive symbolism or coded language these people use. How the operatives are energized by a success of that nature, and how they react to the candidate’s handling of the situation, will also be interesting to study. This is the political frontier on social media. It would be an ultimate satisfaction for these people whose goal is to be as cryptic and subversive as possible, to penetrate the mainstream consciousness with their ideology to any extent. The more they are successful in this, the more they can come out of the shadows in public life – the radical rise in white supremacist activity and violence after the Trump campaign being the ultimate indicator of off-social-media implications. When you have a young base that is highly aware, like Bernie does, you are better prepared to meet dangers like this despite being largely ignorant of memery. If there is not a strong base of people fluent in memery attached to the campaign, either people like Andrew Yang or Williamson must be personally very aware, or they risk being the target of these semi-ironic, subversive troll political operatives – who, thanks to 2016, have a successful blueprint for their operations. After the Trump campaign, and seeing how the 2020 election is opening up, we can figure at least one thing out – that it’s quite risky to wage a major political campaign in this day and age without awareness of the memery behind elections or internet culture.

The Right Can Meme – But So Can Everyone Else, Now

Why do alt-right ideologues work so heavily within meme culture? They even have a slogan, “the left can’t meme”, and take pride in their ability to meme effectively. According to most scholars and activists, the art and science of political memery has been harnessed most effectively by conservative organizations. Why is that? Social media and mobile technologies that offer a “direct-to-consumer” political experience circumvent traditional norms that exist in public discourse. Silos of algorithmic echo chambers allow toxic cultures to germinate where they otherwise wouldn’t in geographic society. Things that would never be said on TV or in town halls can be said in exclusive meme content groups. This makes it one of the few opportunities that fringe groups have to portray themselves as something other than fringe. There are extreme left segments of social media too – and if you dig in, you’ll find the memes. This may be a personal bias, but the memes on the left are actually better – however, Pepe is a very low bar to meet. While the extreme left has been systematically targeted and exterminated by law enforcement in this country for decades, the extreme right was only emboldened. They have the Tea Party, Roger Stone-esque thinktanks, Klan members policing our streets with guns and uniforms, and a man on TV sharing their memes and speaking their dogwhistles out to the entire world. Across America, non-whites were being shot at gas stations, harassed in grocery stores, and anybody who dared to say anything was drowned out by chants of “build the wall – send them back”. The “silent majority” was roused and raising their voices. Movements like the Marianne campaign have similar synergies with a silent majority – and the orbs are our first clue. Marianne said nothing about orbs, but orbs are the object because the orbs represent individual and collective power, unity with one-ness within and without. It hearkens to an all-encompassing mystical power. It tapped into a mythos as much as the Trump campaign did. This is from the young people drawn to her campaign. The old people drawn to her campaign have an analogous draw – they feel that they are also a silent majority – the silent majority of all religious and spiritual people who feel that their spiritual life has been forcibly separated from their political life for far too long. They too, are rallying around a “mystical” one-ness that feels more and more righteous as more people keep saying, “me, too”. The Trump campaign roused together people who wanted to get the politicians out of politics and the Other out of America. Marianne has realized that what we really wanted, was to get our morals back in to our politics. And that was the power behind the alt-right political memers who were so successful in the last election – they didn’t rally around getting certain people out, they do everything they do to move their morals in. That was the deeper moving force and potency.
Is OrbGang an analog to the Pepe memes of Trump’s campaign, as Reason magazine argues? In a way, I suppose you could say that. They were both organic movements that began outside the scope of the official campaigns. While OrbGang has ironic under/over-tones, most of them are sincere in their belief that amplifying Marianne’s voice in the elections is the primary goal of the meme movement. The Anonymous and Pepe movements were centered around trolling activities, having a genesis on 4Chan, and experienced major diminishing when their culture tried to shift to serious applications. Now that the memery behind elections is officially mainstream, we can see the rise of things like the Orb movement from more mainstream sources, like Facebook and Twitter, instead of dark corners like 4Chan. Additionally, the members rally around to actual causes of the campaign. For instance, when Marianne asked her followers to donate to Senator Mike Gravel’s campaign to keep him in the debates. These spontaneous meme groups rallied and made sure he got enough donations to qualify – notably, this was happening a mere week after the spontaneous forming of the groups. The Marianne campaign did not have to apprehend, assess, and act in order to get this outcome from the group activity, it was just endemic to the meme culture in some way. The Pepe groups around this time were not only without any sort of guiding goals or principles whatsoever, they were still deep in 4Chan sipping Mountain Dew, scribbling grotesque portrayals of feminists into Microsoft Paint while using sexual slang like ‘cuck’ to express themselves. They are both meme-based election movements, which is notable – but that’s where the similarities end. We need to not just be talking about the broad implications of memery behind election campaigns, but the specific iterations of this new technology and discourse, and their unique characteristics. We need to be able to forecast, and prepare. We need to not be caught so unawares that a small group of pre-teens can effectively hijack our political discourse, simply because they have a technology or language that we do not understand. We saw the end of ‘politics as usual’ with the Trump campaign, in many ways. There were many confounding mechanics at play in the 2016 election, but what happened in meme-space deliberately shifted the needle. There’s no denying their political force and role in our political discourse. It will be interesting to see how the political establishment evolves to meet it – at present, it appears that only the political outsider candidates have a real grasp on the situation.


Let’s help get Marianne Williamson into the White House! We don’t have any more time to waste, changes need to be made, and she’s the best chance we have to create a better future for all. 

Connect with
the Campaign!

and stay up to date. 

My Journey as a Marianne2020 Meme Group Mod

My Journey as a Marianne2020 Meme Group Mod



My Journey as a Marianne2020 Meme Group Mod

(Originally published on socialstrategist.net – by Sarah Marilyn)

It started out as irony – like it did for most of us millenials. The memes may have started off as jokes, but what Marianne was saying was 100% serious – and nothing she was saying really sounded like a bad idea.

It was just so far-out from the rehearsed pandering we’ve become so accustomed to.

Suddenly, within mere hours of memery, I was convinced she was the best option and the one who had what it took to defeat Trump. As my ironic engagement grew, my unironic support also grew.

I volunteered for her campaign.

From Ironic to Un-Ironic Support

I’ve never officially joined any candidate’s campaign until this week – and I don’t even have an explicable reason why this time is different – it just started with the memes, and then I believed.

The social media of the Obama and Trump elections fascinated and inspired me. I studied them at length, and as the Trump campaign unfolded I couldn’t help but marvel at the genius of it. It was a campaign perfectly informed by the role of social media in the Obama campaigns, the natural successor in strategy – or so it seemed to me. It seemed likewise rather obvious to me that Marianne was the natural next step.

One of my favorite memes so far is this one:


  Yeah, my heart began skipping beats.

Marianne’s message of love conquering hate rang like the strategic successor to the Trump campaign. But more than that, it galvanized the last of my ill feelings towards the Trump campaign (I was a vocal anti-Trump activist, until I watched enough Netflix documentaries and read enough thought pieces to make sense of the Trump phenomenon).

Understanding engenders amiability – I began to accept Trump for what he was, and was able to turn my focus more to understanding political problems, instead of political figures I viewed as problematic. I tired of cancel culture and #MeToo persecutions.

Trump is a step on America’s road to greatness. Regardless of how someone feels about him, that’s what he represents being the president. Marianne is just the next step. The natural reaction, the strategic successor, the next foot that we put forward on our pursuit of greatness.

If Trump spoke the big truths of 2016, Marianne is speaking the big truths of 2020. She just tells it like it is.

Orbs For Everyone

Within 48 hours of the first Democratic Debate ending (which I hadn’t even watched), I had co-founded Marianne Williamson’s Dank Meme Stash on Facebook, saw it grow to over 1000 members with 100+ posts per day, been introduced to a national manager of the campaign, and been contacted and interviewed by reporters trying to get a pulse on the burgeoning movement. It made for a wild weekend.

I’ve been cataloging parts of my journey with posts like my Marianne Meme Page Roundup and the Best of Marianne2020 Memes posts.

The group quickly developed a quirky character, where members of all levels of irony would arrive and begin using the lingo that spontaneously grew up from the comment feeds.

Bearing witness to swaths of people like me, going through a similar journey after stumbling upon the memes – it really drove home that a large, real movement was being built. We all collectively embraced the grassroots orb-anizing.

We dubbed her the Orb Queen, even though Marianne herself had said nothing about orbs – the orb emoji became a universal symbol of her/our individual and collective power. We memed her soundbytes and tweets into ironic oblivion within a matter of days.

When users with less empathy for the movement joined and raised objections and critiques of Marianne, they were met with words of love – ironic or not. The standard of discourse was surprisingly lifted and overly kind, for a meme group. Everyone had a right to speak, and when people disagreed, they disagreed lovingly.

Whether we were serious or not, we collectively began to realize that Marianne’s vision was not a joke – we had unwittingly proven her point.



I am conventionally attractive, live in Bushwick, and am well-versed in both the ancient and the digital arts – just sayin’, Camp Marianne

The Memery Behind Winning Election Campaigns

Meme culture is oft discussed, and rarely understood. One thing I do know is that memes start out as jokes before they get serious.

I initially encountered a lot of resistance in the official Marianne2020 organizing networks and groups. A lot of older people who had been following Marianne for quite a while, and who take her very seriously, were quite distrustful of the ironic meme phenomenon.

I was called a “troll hater” for sharing a meme about Marianne “Re-Aligning America’s Chakras Again”, and had to explain that I was actually a new ardent admirer of Marianne. Many felt that the jokes would cause people to not take her seriously, to write her off, and that the memes were mocking her. Many felt that the memes would dilute her serious messages as they became mainstream.

Well, they were right in a way – the memes were largely mocking her at first. I began explaining myself in comment feeds to these people, and the way that irony and millenials interact – the way memes work.

I recounted to the distrustful members how similar phenomena had been observed during the Obama campaigns, and how it evolved during the Trump campaign, and now how what we were witnessing was following in the same pattern.

Many who were skeptical at first began to understand, and generational gaps were bridged quite rapidly. We understood that with Marianne’s unifying message of love, people from all walks of life and differing depths of Marianne-irony would be joining the movement, and we had to learn how to welcome them.

Likewise, as fellow dank memers began joining the official Marianne2020 forums, we were learning that we had to also be kind and accommodate older Americans in the movement, and try and be helpful to them.

Marianne has talked about how older people often have radical love in their hearts – their depth of life experience affects the depth of their potential love. There is a lot for younger radicals to appreciate in that.

It seemed we unwittingly, once again, proved her correct when she said that she would defeat Trump with the power of love. I was suddenly immersed in an army of love, composed of real people who could both communicate via memes, and many who felt as if memes were a foreign language, or an invading force – and we all just started throwing heart reaccs and emojis around at each other.


My Neuroscientist Past Life Makes an Appearance

Discourse via memes is a matter of bandwidth. So much information, inferences and context exist in a meme, which imprints on the brain in one of the most potent ways for a human brain – visually.

On top of that, through its employ of direct, indirect and composite symbolism, it also engages the faculty of memory. Engaging or accessing the faculties of memory even once automatically increases the familiarity and fluency of the notions conveyed. When something is familiar or fluent to us, we are disposed to feel favorably towards it.

Popular meme templates are frequently re-used in different contexts, which increases the fluency that meme transmits with. As successive iterations of a meme become popular, the meme gains new facets and sets of inferences that it communicates, and is thus able to communicate many layers of meaning. All of this, in a single image composition.

Are the people who compose these memes artistic geniuses? Usually no – they are just people who are fluent in this method of communicating. People who understand the memes are able to read the language, and people who make them are able to read as well as compose speech in the language. Its just a method of communicating, like any other language – except it is a post-Internet language.

This meme-power of someone/thing is essentially what the star-power of a celebrity is. That recognizability, that name familiarity. That thing that Trump, and the Clintons and the Bushs had. It makes people compelling and fluent when they have it attached to their name.

Meme-power is bigger than star-power though, because of the bandwidth of communication relayed in a meme. Its the equivalent of a volume knob – and meme-power is simply a much louder setting on the dial.

It is debatable whether Trump had more celebrity name recognition or idea fluency than Hillary Clinton, but it is not debatable who had the bigger meme-power in the last election.

We may not know whether Marianne Williamson is winning our votes ironically or un-ironically, but the #BigTruth is that she is now a very serious candidate.


Let’s help get Marianne Williamson into the White House! We don’t have any more time to waste, changes need to be made, and she’s the best chance we have to create a better future for all. 

Connect with
the Campaign!

and stay up to date.